norgitov/ trends
Technology · people · ideas
Back to discovery/arXiv1 hour ago

Cosine Similarity Is Not Evidence: Measuring the Noise Floor of Interpretability Transfer Under Quantization

The paper discusses how cosine similarity, a scale-invariant statistic used to measure interpretability transfer between full-precision and quantized models, lacks necessary context for proper interpretation. It highlights that without knowing the noise floor, such as the class separation measure ρ, reported values like 0.996 cannot confirm preservation of interpretability. The study shows that at INT4 quantization, the direction of the decision variable rotated beyond the estimator's noise, while at INT8, no movement was detected, but this does not imply equivalence. The authors recommend additional reporting practices to improve transparency.

Open original
SIGNAL FROM THE SOURCE
28
September 2026
Tracking sinceSeptember 28, 2026
Momentum—More observations needed
Discussion—No comment count provided
PublishedSeptember 28, 2026Pranav Varshney
BEHIND THE NUMBERS

How interest changes

The publication is the signal

This official source does not publish popularity metrics. The story is refreshed from its RSS feed.

Real observations only. History before source connection is not reconstructed.

WHY IT MAY MATTER

This research highlights the importance of understanding the noise floor when using scale-invariant statistics like cosine similarity to assess interpretability transfer in quantized models, ensuring more reliable and transparent AI safety evaluations.

A useful discovery?
KEEP EXPLORING

Connected ideas

Explore topic