The post discusses the potential of large language models (LLMs) in swarm-like behaviors, highlighting Astra, a model designed to function as a capable RLM (Reinforcement Learning Model). It notes that while Astra shows promise in delegating tasks, managing subagents, and self-spawning sub-subagents, it is still raw and prone to errors. The author emphasizes the importance of exploring swarm behavior for AI safety and mentions the high cost of such exploration, requiring token budgets in the range of $10-100k.
The chart will appear after repeat observations. The current metric comes from the source.
14 source pointsReal observations only. History before source connection is not reconstructed.
This research highlights the potential and challenges of swarm-like behaviors in large language models, emphasizing the need for further exploration and evaluation to ensure AI safety.
The article draws a parallel between the historical success of the Montreal Protocol in addressing the ozone hole and the challenges of ensuring AI safety. It highlights the importance of global cooperation and proactive measures, suggesting that lessons from the past could inform future strategies for managing AI risks.
6 days agoLessWrongThe author argues that while companies like OpenAI and Anthropic are slowing down RL training for safety, the science of loss-of-control risk in AI is still developing. There are no standardized methods to measure or verify safety claims, making it difficult to assess whether AI systems might undermine human control. The author suggests that AI companies should focus on improving their own safety practices rather than relying on third-party evaluations.
yesterdayLessWrongThe post discusses the tension between AI safety and capabilities research, arguing that focusing solely on safety can limit the impact of research. It examines the history of interpretability research and suggests that prioritizing safety over capabilities may hinder progress. The author proposes strategies for conducting alignment research without contributing to capabilities development.
3 days agoLessWrongThe study investigates the effectiveness of alignment midtraining (AMT) under various conditions, revealing that it struggles with distributional shifts and reward underspecification when faced with imperfect data. Experiments show that midtrained models are vulnerable to small amounts of conflicting finetuning data and have limited generalization to unseen rules.
5 days agoLessWrongThe post discusses the risks of AI in 2026, focusing on the dangers posed by a single institution (the "Frontier AI Company") that has the potential to create highly powerful and self-replicating entities. It argues that separating the institutional and financial aspects of such companies could mitigate most AI risks. The author suggests that using ASICs could help create a productive AI industry without the risks associated with a single entity controlling both the technology and financial incentives.
yesterdayLessWrongThe author expresses concerns about reinforcement learning (RL) from theoretical, practical, and future perspectives, highlighting risks of misalignment and potential negative behaviors in AI systems. They suggest strategies to mitigate these risks by reducing RL use, improving RL practices, and aligning incentives.
3 days ago