norgitov/ trends
Technology · people · ideas
Back to discovery/Daily Papers1 hour ago

Who Gets a Token, and What Does It Carry? Unequal Name Support and Concept Access in Large Language Models

Names are personal identifiers, but they also carry social meaning and are widely used to evaluate how language models treat different people. Such evaluations typically assume that matched names are comparable model inputs. We show that this assumption often fails at the lexical interface: matched names are not necessarily matched inputs. Some names receive direct single-token access, while others are assembled from multiple subwords, creating unequal name-surface support. Across nearly half a million first names and 12 LLM-associated tokenizers, direct lexical access is highly selective, model dependent, and uneven across race- and gender-associated name metadata. We introduce NameTrace, a model-native, fine-grained, pre-behavioral framework for measuring whether unequal name-surface support remains a vocabulary property or becomes visible in task-relevant internal representations. NameTrace measures concept accessibility from the model's own probabilities over task-specific adjective axes with continuous task-aligned weights. On matched atomic and short-fragmented names within the same race/ethnicity--gender-associated strata, support predicts systematic differences in concept accessibility across fellowship, hiring, clinical assessment, and lending. These differences persist across all eight matched strata, extend across model families, and transfer to unseen names. Hidden-state interventions further show that the measured task directions have downstream leverage, shifting later constrained choices. Unequal lexical support is therefore demographically structured at the input and remains visible in task-relevant model computation. NameTrace makes lexical comparability measurable, supporting a broader principle: behavioral comparability begins with lexical comparability.

Translation pending · showing the source description
Open original
SIGNAL FROM THE SOURCE
1
source votes
Tracking sinceSeptember 29, 20261 source votes
Momentum—More observations needed
Discussion—Read comments ↗
PublishedSeptember 28, 2026Mir Tafseer Nayeem, Davood Rafiei
BEHIND THE NUMBERS

How interest changes

History starts here

The chart will appear after repeat observations. The current metric comes from the source.

1 source votes

Real observations only. History before source connection is not reconstructed.

A useful discovery?
KEEP EXPLORING

Connected ideas

Explore topic